<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Contextualizing now integrated with Comapping</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hypershifters.com/blog/2010-02-14/contextualizing-now-integrated-with-comapping.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hypershifters.com/blog/2010-02-14/contextualizing-now-integrated-with-comapping.html</link>
	<description>Visualize it working</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 13:36:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: medyum</title>
		<link>http://www.hypershifters.com/blog/2010-02-14/contextualizing-now-integrated-with-comapping.html/comment-page-1#comment-1328</link>
		<dc:creator>medyum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 16:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hypershifters.com/?p=1000#comment-1328</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll post the same information to my blog, thanks for ideas and great article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;ll post the same information to my blog, thanks for ideas and great article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wood Desktop Organizers</title>
		<link>http://www.hypershifters.com/blog/2010-02-14/contextualizing-now-integrated-with-comapping.html/comment-page-1#comment-1282</link>
		<dc:creator>Wood Desktop Organizers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 22:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hypershifters.com/?p=1000#comment-1282</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll post the same information to my blog, thanks for ideas and great article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;ll post the same information to my blog, thanks for ideas and great article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wallace Tait</title>
		<link>http://www.hypershifters.com/blog/2010-02-14/contextualizing-now-integrated-with-comapping.html/comment-page-1#comment-1260</link>
		<dc:creator>Wallace Tait</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 14:37:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hypershifters.com/?p=1000#comment-1260</guid>
		<description>Like many things associated with Mindjet these days, they seem to fade into obscurity when mentioning add-ins. Mindjet simply don’t respond at all or choose to respond way after any initial contact.
Yes; Context Organizer is also a desktop standalone product that works very well with MindManager too. The convenience of the Cloud and the fact that Context Organizer can communicate with the XML of almost any product, now makes this tool a very invaluable inclusion for analyzing Web and docs for research and data clarity.

The Comapping medium will only get better, and if the response is favorable, I’m sure many more information management product developers will see the use value of including the cloud service of Contextual Organizer to their software applications.

I do know there are a couple of very mainstream mapping developers seriously considering an “analyze” button built right into their apps for the purpose of using Context Organizer.
There’s one thing the Comapping folk have to change though; Comapping is definitely not a Mind Mapping app. It’s rather difficult to categorize this application, I do know they use the term Mind mapping within their introduction. IMO; Visual mapping may be more definitive of what the product is regarding graphical qualities. The top down approach and output to the right makes this app more aligned with process that pushes a systematic visual aspect outwards.

It really is an excellent product and I have become another Comapping junkie just like Malik De Kok J
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like many things associated with Mindjet these days, they seem to fade into obscurity when mentioning add-ins. Mindjet simply don’t respond at all or choose to respond way after any initial contact.<br />
Yes; Context Organizer is also a desktop standalone product that works very well with MindManager too. The convenience of the Cloud and the fact that Context Organizer can communicate with the XML of almost any product, now makes this tool a very invaluable inclusion for analyzing Web and docs for research and data clarity.</p>
<p>The Comapping medium will only get better, and if the response is favorable, I’m sure many more information management product developers will see the use value of including the cloud service of Contextual Organizer to their software applications.</p>
<p>I do know there are a couple of very mainstream mapping developers seriously considering an “analyze” button built right into their apps for the purpose of using Context Organizer.<br />
There’s one thing the Comapping folk have to change though; Comapping is definitely not a Mind Mapping app. It’s rather difficult to categorize this application, I do know they use the term Mind mapping within their introduction. IMO; Visual mapping may be more definitive of what the product is regarding graphical qualities. The top down approach and output to the right makes this app more aligned with process that pushes a systematic visual aspect outwards.</p>
<p>It really is an excellent product and I have become another Comapping junkie just like Malik De Kok J</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wallace Tait</title>
		<link>http://www.hypershifters.com/blog/2010-02-14/contextualizing-now-integrated-with-comapping.html/comment-page-1#comment-1824</link>
		<dc:creator>Wallace Tait</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 14:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hypershifters.com/?p=1000#comment-1824</guid>
		<description>Like many things associated with Mindjet these days, they seem to fade into obscurity when mentioning add-ins. Mindjet simply don’t respond at all or choose to respond way after any initial contact.
Yes; Context Organizer is also a desktop standalone product that works very well with MindManager too. The convenience of the Cloud and the fact that Context Organizer can communicate with the XML of almost any product, now makes this tool a very invaluable inclusion for analyzing Web and docs for research and data clarity.

The Comapping medium will only get better, and if the response is favorable, I’m sure many more information management product developers will see the use value of including the cloud service of Contextual Organizer to their software applications.

I do know there are a couple of very mainstream mapping developers seriously considering an “analyze” button built right into their apps for the purpose of using Context Organizer.
There’s one thing the Comapping folk have to change though; Comapping is definitely not a Mind Mapping app. It’s rather difficult to categorize this application, I do know they use the term Mind mapping within their introduction. IMO; Visual mapping may be more definitive of what the product is regarding graphical qualities. The top down approach and output to the right makes this app more aligned with process that pushes a systematic visual aspect outwards.

It really is an excellent product and I have become another Comapping junkie just like Malik De Kok J</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like many things associated with Mindjet these days, they seem to fade into obscurity when mentioning add-ins. Mindjet simply don’t respond at all or choose to respond way after any initial contact.<br />
Yes; Context Organizer is also a desktop standalone product that works very well with MindManager too. The convenience of the Cloud and the fact that Context Organizer can communicate with the XML of almost any product, now makes this tool a very invaluable inclusion for analyzing Web and docs for research and data clarity.</p>
<p>The Comapping medium will only get better, and if the response is favorable, I’m sure many more information management product developers will see the use value of including the cloud service of Contextual Organizer to their software applications.</p>
<p>I do know there are a couple of very mainstream mapping developers seriously considering an “analyze” button built right into their apps for the purpose of using Context Organizer.<br />
There’s one thing the Comapping folk have to change though; Comapping is definitely not a Mind Mapping app. It’s rather difficult to categorize this application, I do know they use the term Mind mapping within their introduction. IMO; Visual mapping may be more definitive of what the product is regarding graphical qualities. The top down approach and output to the right makes this app more aligned with process that pushes a systematic visual aspect outwards.</p>
<p>It really is an excellent product and I have become another Comapping junkie just like Malik De Kok J</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wallace Tait</title>
		<link>http://www.hypershifters.com/blog/2010-02-14/contextualizing-now-integrated-with-comapping.html/comment-page-1#comment-1825</link>
		<dc:creator>Wallace Tait</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 14:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hypershifters.com/?p=1000#comment-1825</guid>
		<description>Like many things associated with Mindjet these days, they seem to fade into obscurity when mentioning add-ins. Mindjet simply don’t respond at all or choose to respond way after any initial contact.
Yes; Context Organizer is also a desktop standalone product that works very well with MindManager too. The convenience of the Cloud and the fact that Context Organizer can communicate with the XML of almost any product, now makes this tool a very invaluable inclusion for analyzing Web and docs for research and data clarity.

The Comapping medium will only get better, and if the response is favorable, I’m sure many more information management product developers will see the use value of including the cloud service of Contextual Organizer to their software applications.

I do know there are a couple of very mainstream mapping developers seriously considering an “analyze” button built right into their apps for the purpose of using Context Organizer.
There’s one thing the Comapping folk have to change though; Comapping is definitely not a Mind Mapping app. It’s rather difficult to categorize this application, I do know they use the term Mind mapping within their introduction. IMO; Visual mapping may be more definitive of what the product is regarding graphical qualities. The top down approach and output to the right makes this app more aligned with process that pushes a systematic visual aspect outwards.

It really is an excellent product and I have become another Comapping junkie just like Malik De Kok J</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like many things associated with Mindjet these days, they seem to fade into obscurity when mentioning add-ins. Mindjet simply don’t respond at all or choose to respond way after any initial contact.<br />
Yes; Context Organizer is also a desktop standalone product that works very well with MindManager too. The convenience of the Cloud and the fact that Context Organizer can communicate with the XML of almost any product, now makes this tool a very invaluable inclusion for analyzing Web and docs for research and data clarity.</p>
<p>The Comapping medium will only get better, and if the response is favorable, I’m sure many more information management product developers will see the use value of including the cloud service of Contextual Organizer to their software applications.</p>
<p>I do know there are a couple of very mainstream mapping developers seriously considering an “analyze” button built right into their apps for the purpose of using Context Organizer.<br />
There’s one thing the Comapping folk have to change though; Comapping is definitely not a Mind Mapping app. It’s rather difficult to categorize this application, I do know they use the term Mind mapping within their introduction. IMO; Visual mapping may be more definitive of what the product is regarding graphical qualities. The top down approach and output to the right makes this app more aligned with process that pushes a systematic visual aspect outwards.</p>
<p>It really is an excellent product and I have become another Comapping junkie just like Malik De Kok J</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexis van Dam</title>
		<link>http://www.hypershifters.com/blog/2010-02-14/contextualizing-now-integrated-with-comapping.html/comment-page-1#comment-1258</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexis van Dam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 11:16:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hypershifters.com/?p=1000#comment-1258</guid>
		<description>

Wallace, I agree with you on the usefulness of CoMapping and Contextual Organizer. Due to collapsing branches only the requested information is visible, the rest is not visible. Therefore one does not get overwhelmed by information. On the website of Contextual Organizer there is a &lt;a href=&quot;http://bit.ly/9YTOER&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;short video introduction&lt;/a&gt; on the ‘marriage’ between &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hypershifters.com/reviews-tests/mindjet-mindmanager-8-test&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;MindManager&lt;/a&gt; and Contextual Organizer.
In my opinion this combination can be very helpful for the knowledge worker who processes a lot of information.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wallace, I agree with you on the usefulness of CoMapping and Contextual Organizer. Due to collapsing branches only the requested information is visible, the rest is not visible. Therefore one does not get overwhelmed by information. On the website of Contextual Organizer there is a <a href="http://bit.ly/9YTOER" rel="nofollow">short video introduction</a> on the ‘marriage’ between <a href="http://www.hypershifters.com/reviews-tests/mindjet-mindmanager-8-test" rel="nofollow">MindManager</a> and Contextual Organizer.<br />
In my opinion this combination can be very helpful for the knowledge worker who processes a lot of information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexis van Dam</title>
		<link>http://www.hypershifters.com/blog/2010-02-14/contextualizing-now-integrated-with-comapping.html/comment-page-1#comment-1822</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexis van Dam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 11:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hypershifters.com/?p=1000#comment-1822</guid>
		<description>Wallace, I agree with you on the usefulness of CoMapping and Contextual Organizer. Due to collapsing branches only the requested information is visible, the rest is not visible. Therefore one does not get overwhelmed by information. On the website of Contextual Organizer there is a &lt;a href=&quot;http://bit.ly/9YTOER&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;short video introduction&lt;/a&gt; on the ‘marriage’ between &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hypershifters.com/reviews-tests/mindjet-mindmanager-8-test&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;MindManager&lt;/a&gt; and Contextual Organizer.
In my opinion this combination can be very helpful for the knowledge worker who processes a lot of information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wallace, I agree with you on the usefulness of CoMapping and Contextual Organizer. Due to collapsing branches only the requested information is visible, the rest is not visible. Therefore one does not get overwhelmed by information. On the website of Contextual Organizer there is a <a href="http://bit.ly/9YTOER" rel="nofollow">short video introduction</a> on the ‘marriage’ between <a href="http://www.hypershifters.com/reviews-tests/mindjet-mindmanager-8-test" rel="nofollow">MindManager</a> and Contextual Organizer.<br />
In my opinion this combination can be very helpful for the knowledge worker who processes a lot of information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexis van Dam</title>
		<link>http://www.hypershifters.com/blog/2010-02-14/contextualizing-now-integrated-with-comapping.html/comment-page-1#comment-1823</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexis van Dam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 11:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hypershifters.com/?p=1000#comment-1823</guid>
		<description>Wallace, I agree with you on the usefulness of CoMapping and Contextual Organizer. Due to collapsing branches only the requested information is visible, the rest is not visible. Therefore one does not get overwhelmed by information. On the website of Contextual Organizer there is a &lt;a href=&quot;http://bit.ly/9YTOER&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;short video introduction&lt;/a&gt; on the ‘marriage’ between &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hypershifters.com/reviews-tests/mindjet-mindmanager-8-test&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;MindManager&lt;/a&gt; and Contextual Organizer.
In my opinion this combination can be very helpful for the knowledge worker who processes a lot of information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wallace, I agree with you on the usefulness of CoMapping and Contextual Organizer. Due to collapsing branches only the requested information is visible, the rest is not visible. Therefore one does not get overwhelmed by information. On the website of Contextual Organizer there is a <a href="http://bit.ly/9YTOER" rel="nofollow">short video introduction</a> on the ‘marriage’ between <a href="http://www.hypershifters.com/reviews-tests/mindjet-mindmanager-8-test" rel="nofollow">MindManager</a> and Contextual Organizer.<br />
In my opinion this combination can be very helpful for the knowledge worker who processes a lot of information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
